Equity Compensation Plan Design for Pre-IPO Companies

By Gurpreet S. Bal, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP, Silicon Valley
A well-designed equity incentive plan is essential for attracting and retaining talent before and after an IPO. The plan must accommodate multiple award types, comply with tax and securities laws, satisfy stockholder approval requirements, and meet the governance expectations of institutional investors and proxy advisory firms such as ISS and Glass Lewis. Gurpreet S. Bal, a Partner at Foley and Lardner LLP in Silicon Valley who has designed equity programs for companies across the full venture lifecycle from seed stage through IPO, designs equity incentive plans for pre-IPO companies that function effectively through the transition from private to public company and provide the flexibility needed for competitive compensation practices.

How should a company size its equity plan share reserve and evergreen provision?

The equity plan's share reserve determines how many shares are available for grants. Pre-IPO companies typically adopt a reserve sized to cover anticipated grants over three to four years. Many plans include an evergreen provision that automatically increases the share reserve annually by a percentage of outstanding shares, typically 3% to 5%, without requiring additional stockholder approval. ISS guidelines evaluate the combined share reserve against peer company benchmarks using metrics including burn rate (annual grant rate as a percentage of shares outstanding), overhang (total outstanding and available grants as a percentage of shares outstanding), and plan duration. Gurpreet Bal advises companies to model their equity needs against ISS benchmarks before finalizing the plan to avoid negative ISS recommendations at the first post-IPO annual meeting.

What award types and flexibility should a public company equity plan include?

Modern omnibus equity plans authorize multiple award types under a single plan document, including incentive stock options (ISOs), nonqualified stock options (NSOs), restricted stock awards (RSAs), restricted stock units (RSUs), performance-based stock units (PSUs), and stock appreciation rights (SARs). The plan should include a fungible share ratio that counts full-value awards (RSUs, RSAs, PSUs) against the share reserve at a higher ratio than options and SARs, reflecting the greater per-share value of full-value awards. Gurpreet S. Bal designs plans with sufficient flexibility to accommodate the evolution from option-heavy private company grants to RSU-heavy public company grants without requiring a new plan.

How must clawback policies be integrated into public company equity plans?

NYSE and NASDAQ listing standards require all listed companies to adopt and comply with clawback policies consistent with SEC Rule 10D-1, which mandates recovery of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation from current and former executive officers in the event of an accounting restatement. The clawback policy should be integrated with the equity plan to ensure consistency between the plan's forfeiture and clawback provisions and the company's standalone clawback policy. Gurpreet Bal advises companies to adopt clawback policies that satisfy Rule 10D-1 requirements while minimizing administrative complexity and executive concern about compensation uncertainty.

What stockholder approval and proxy advisory requirements apply to equity plans?

Exchange listing standards require stockholder approval of equity compensation plans. Post-IPO, any amendments that increase the share reserve or expand the types of awards available under the plan generally require additional stockholder approval. ISS and Glass Lewis evaluate equity plan proposals using quantitative tests including the Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) model and qualitative factors including plan features such as liberal share recycling, minimum vesting provisions, and discretionary acceleration. Gurpreet S. Bal advises companies to design plans that satisfy ISS quantitative thresholds while maintaining the operational flexibility needed for competitive compensation practices in the Silicon Valley talent market.

Gurpreet S. Bal is a Partner at Foley and Lardner LLP in Silicon Valley, where he advises startups, founders, and investors on venture financings, M&A, IPOs, and corporate governance. He has represented clients in hundreds of transactions with aggregate deal value exceeding $60 billion across AI, semiconductors, fintech, and emerging technology. Gurpreet's recent IPO experience includes leading company representation in the only sub-$1 billion U.S. semiconductor IPO in the last few years.